Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots
Date: 2008-10-16 14:20:59
Message-ID: 1224166859.3808.296.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 13:55 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Other related patches are
> * recovery_infrastruc.v9.patch
> * atomic_subxids.v7.patch
> They don't all apply cleanly together, but the changes are unrelated, so
> those patches can still be reviewed without wasting energy.
>
> Next phase is connecting and running queries, next few days. That will
> probably shake out a few more bugs from this code.

I've integrated my five patches together into one now:
* recovery_infrastruc.v9.patch
* atomic_subxids.v7.patch
* hs_connect
* hs_checks
* hs_snapshot

Seems positive that it all integrated so quickly and tests OK.
More later.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-10-16 15:52:34 Re: Deriving Recovery Snapshots
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-16 13:28:03 Re: Annoying error messages in _dosmaperr