| From: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2008-09-11 12:39:25 |
| Message-ID: | 1221136765.17270.75.camel@PCD12478 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I'd imagine that even if applying the WAL on the slave is blocked, it's
> still streamed from the master to the slave, and in case of failover the
> slave will fast-forward before starting up as the new master.
Which begs the question: what happens with a query which is running on
the slave in the moment when the slave switches from recovery mode and
starts up ? Should the running queries be canceled if they are blocking
applying of WAL, to allow start-up, or let them finish ?
Cheers,
Csaba.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-09-11 12:42:54 | Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-09-11 12:23:32 | Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby |