Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I would say that's an improvement. Do you think it isn't?
>> It seems like a log spam hazard at high connection rates.
[ shrug... ] Failing to report a problem is a problem, too. By your
argument any error message anywhere should be removed because it might
be a "log spam hazard" at high reporting rates.
regards, tom lane