Re: recovery.conf parsing problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recovery.conf parsing problems
Date: 2006-12-13 22:02:06
Message-ID: 12180.1166047326@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> OK, I would propose to extend the guc-file.l to include sufficient code
> to allow the parsing of the conf files to be identical between the
> postgresql.conf and the recovery.conf (it isn't the same yet).

It would probably be far easier for long-term maintenance if you just
built an independent lexer, instead of trying to make guc-file.l
serve multiple masters.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-13 22:21:54 Re: Operator class group proposal
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-12-13 21:46:46 Re: Operator class group proposal