Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-22 22:15:10
Message-ID: 1216764910.3894.513.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 14:06 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Minimalism isn't its own reward. Obviously Tom has reason to worry
> about the overall maintenance effort for the PostgreSQL code. But we
> need to balance that against the need to add features that users want
> and will keep our community growing.

Well, minimalistic is a new compliment for me... ;-)

Every time we add code to core, the next patch just got bigger since we
must always include all aspects of the server features.

I want to *increase* the extensibility of Postgres with plugins and
APIs. When you mention what we could learn from MySQL, I would say
introduce pluggable extensibility in more places.

Solving the putting the pieces back together problem is a somewhat
easier problem than trying to maintain a whole spittoon full of (cool)
extensions in core.

Do you want Tom to
a) spend a month improving the optimizer
b) get him to review already working code so we can package things

It's a question of priorities.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-22 22:18:01 Re: Plans for 8.4
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-07-22 22:02:03 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?