Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-21 20:17:15
Message-ID: 1216671435.952.59.camel@bloodnok.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:03 -0300, Tom Lane wrote:
> [. . .] I think it
> would be a good idea to be open to reviewing pgfoundry code with the
> same standards we'd use if we were going to integrate it. Perhaps
> commitfest is not the right venue for that, though, if only because
> of the possibility of confusion over what's supposed to happen.

I think this would be a great idea. I would be overjoyed to have veil
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/veil/ reviewed by postgres developers.

__
Marc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-21 20:17:39 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-21 20:14:06 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?