| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |
| Date: | 2008-07-08 15:58:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1215532719.29901.16.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:43 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't
> > think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or
> > better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that).
>
> I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely
> integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/?
>
I am actually against adding to the grammar which is what Simon was
suggesting. If it wants to go into src/pl I wouldn't have a problem with
that. Sorry for not being more clear.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-07-08 16:10:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Extending grant insert on tables to sequences |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-08 15:52:54 | Re: [patch] plproxy v2 |