Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem
Date: 1999-11-25 05:43:01
Message-ID: 12129.943508581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> This is due to 2 problems.
> 1) The awk script is broken over 2 lines.
> 2) Solaris's awk does not seem to understand REs in split(). (nawk's OK)

I don't think so --- the exact same split() construct is there in the
old regress.sh test driver, same as it ever was. I can believe the line
break is a problem, but if there's another problem then you need to
keep digging.

Comparing the two scripts, I wonder if Jan broke it by adding '/bin/sh'
to the invocation of config.guess. Doesn't seem very likely, but...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-11-25 06:09:33 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-11-25 02:23:52 Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c