Re: Wisconsin benchmark

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wisconsin benchmark
Date: 2009-08-14 18:40:50
Message-ID: 12090.1250275250@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> The Wisconsin Benchmark in src/test/bench is broken, probably since 8.2.

Again? :-(

> Attached is a tested patch that fixes it. However, it might be better
> to just remove src/test/bench.

I tend to agree with this opinion. That benchmark is obsolete to the
point of having zero connection to the modern world; which is why we
keep not noticing when it's busted. Anyone want to argue for keeping it
in our sources?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-14 18:57:37 More cruft left behind in doc directory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-14 18:37:24 Re: freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? )