| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 02:08:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1207706899.31956.82.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 15:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, for starters, using binary format. It is undeniable that that
> creates more portability risks (cross-architecture and cross-PG-version
> issues) than text format. Not everyone wants to take those risks for
> benefits that may not be meaningful for their apps.
What are the cross-architecture risks involved?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-09 02:09:21 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-04-09 02:06:13 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-09 02:09:21 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-04-09 02:06:13 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |