| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Date: | 2008-02-26 19:34:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1204054456.4252.420.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I've not been advocating improving pg_restore, which is where the -Fc
> > tricks come in.
> > ...
> > I see you thought I meant pg_restore. I don't thinking extending
> > pg_restore in that way is of sufficiently generic use to make it
> > worthwhile. Extending psql would be worth it, since not all psql scripts
> > come from pg_dump.
>
> OK, the reason I didn't grasp what you are proposing is that it's insane.
I love you too.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Lor | 2008-02-26 19:45:04 | Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-26 19:33:54 | Two Coverity Scan volunteers needed |