Re: archives.postgresql.org change

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org change
Date: 2008-02-24 16:27:09
Message-ID: 1203870429.31387.16.camel@mha-laptop.clients.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 07:53 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 11:25 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 18:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
>
> > AFAIK, we also had a bunch of customizations in mhonarc - did those get
> > migrated over, or are we now running a stock mhonarc?
> >
>
> We only did what Marc told us we had to do. We had a couple of scripts
> that he provided that we had to port from tcsh (yes) to sh, which Alvaro
> kindly did. As I understand it all the scripts did was format the
> messages from the mbox files but to be honest, I didn't read them. I had
> Alvaro and Marc work it out (I refuse to touch tcsh).

As long as these things are covered, that's fine. But it'd be good if
someone could verify it who actually knew about it. I think that means
you, Marc :-) But if that's already done, then drop the point - it just
wasn't clear from the original message.

> >>> Oh, and since you've been fiddling it, please get some documentation up
> >>> on pmt. We didn't have any for the old one that I can find, but we'd
> >>> really like some for the new one. (for one, we've been talking here at
> >>> FOSDEM about auto-syncing some things about the lists between that one
> >>> and the search stuff so we stop missing lists when they are added - and
> >>> it'd be nice to have a documented system to work off for that one)
> >> Sure.
> >
> > Good, thanks!
> >
> > Oh, and I also notice there has been zero commits about this to the
> > autobackup repository, so obviously none of this is included in said
> > backups - that also needs to be fixed.
>
> Its on the list :)

Yay :-)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-02-24 16:30:03 Re: Huh? What is this?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-24 16:24:12 Re: User Wiki