AW: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal
Date: 2000-12-12 16:28:20
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368178@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I take it from the smiley that you're not serious, but actually it seems
> like it might not be a bad idea. I could see appending a CRC to each
> tuple record. Comments anyone?

Let's not get paranoid. If you compress the output the file will get checksummed
anyway. I am against a CRC in binary copy output :-)

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Jones 2000-12-12 17:00:49 Re: No postgres on Solaris
Previous Message mlw 2000-12-12 16:27:33 external function proposal for 7.2