From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | AW: Using Threads? |
Date: | 2000-12-11 10:58:57 |
Message-ID: | 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336816F@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This brings up a good point. Threads are mostly useful when you have
> multiple processes that need to share lots of data, and the interprocess
> overhead is excessive. Because we already have that shared memory area,
> this benefit of threads doesn't buy us much. We sort of already have
> done the _shared_ part, and the addition of sharing our data pages is
> not much of a win.
I agree, that this is not the issue. The only issue for PostgreSQL would be to
efficiently support tenthousands of users.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Heaven | 2000-12-11 11:09:56 | Regular expression question |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-12-11 10:54:03 | AW: Using Threads? |