AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1
Date: 2000-11-09 07:59:41
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA6879633680FD@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on
> ourselves when/if
> CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA;

I do not think this will be the way.

> I would assume that the two
> statements would become synonymous?

No, I think we need the schema below the database hierarchy.
Thus you create a schema when already connected to a database.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-09 08:08:56 AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-11-09 07:55:59 AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherite d from template1