AW: Status of new relation file naming

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Mikheev, Vadim'" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Philip Warner'" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-14 08:00:39
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA68796336807A@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > My vote is for a random number, and then someone can write
> > the tools to display the file info. I'll even volunteer to
> > work on them...

What was the advantage of random number over oid [+version]
in the light that there is an extra field in pg_class for other smgrs ?
We surely want readable names for tablespace files, no ?

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dana.Reed 2000-09-14 08:12:27 RE: [HACKERS] List funnies ?
Previous Message Steve Heaven 2000-09-14 07:59:53 List funnies ?