Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> On 2006-09-18, James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm +1 on the cleaner design you suggested. While I understand the
>> concerns of adding features/API this late;
> Adding features is one thing, breaking existing users of the code is another.
We already have an established solution for people who need backwards
compatibility: download the old userlock code from pgfoundry. I'm
unclear why we should duplicate that project within core.
regards, tom lane