| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Trout <threshar(at)threshar(dot)is-a-geek(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Slow PITR restore |
| Date: | 2007-12-14 12:15:17 |
| Message-ID: | 1197634518.7974.1.camel@hannu-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2007-12-14 kell 10:39, kirjutas Markus
Schiltknecht:
> Hi,
>
> (For parallelized queries, superuser privileges might appear wrong, but
> I'm arguing that parallelizing the rights checking isn't worth the
> trouble, so the initiating worker backend should do that and only
> delegate safe jobs to hepler backends. Or is that a serious limitation
> in a way?)
at least functions defined with SECURITY DEFINER; may be a problem
------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-12-14 12:15:36 | Re: Planner ignoring to use INDEX SCAN |
| Previous Message | Enrico Sirola | 2007-12-14 12:12:36 | pgsql constraints and temporal tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-12-14 12:32:07 | Re: [GENERAL] Slow PITR restore |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-12-14 11:42:00 | Re: [GENERAL] Slow PITR restore |