Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)

From: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Bernabe <robert_bernabe(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)
Date: 2007-12-06 20:10:08
Message-ID: 1196971808.5614.6.camel@mca-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 08:50 +0000, Dave Page wrote:

> EnterpriseDB Postgres is essentially a packaging and bundling project in
> which the aim is to provide consistent and easy to use installers for
> Windows, Mac and Linux that allow users to get started with Postgres,
> Slony, PostGIS, pgAdmin, phpPgAdmin etc...
>
> EnterpriseDB Advanced Server is the entirely different product - thats
> the one that includes the Oracle compatibility and replication/migration
> tools etc.

Ah indeed - my mistake for not realising EnterpriseDB Postgres was a
different product from EnterpriseDB Advanced Server
(postgres.enterprisedb.com turned out to be quite an enlightening read).

ATB,

Mark.

--
ILande - Open Source Consultancy
http://www.ilande.co.uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message kelvan 2007-12-07 00:45:26 database tuning
Previous Message Michael Stone 2007-12-06 19:50:33 Re: TB-sized databases