Re: Free Space Map thoughts

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Free Space Map thoughts
Date: 2007-11-09 07:50:40
Message-ID: 1194594640.4251.333.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 23:04 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> > The pages might well be in cache, so the file location might well be
> > irrelevant from an I/O perspective. Maybe. The nth page solution allows
> > the FSM block to be easily located without any FSM index, so might well
> > be faster. Separate files mean more space and more fsyncs too. But even
> > so, I'm not sure either way.
>
> I don't follow any of the logical leaps in this paragraph.

I asked Heikki to explain why he felt the design should go a certain
way, which he didn't do. That's the logical leap I'm worried about.

I repeat: I'm not sure either way.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-11-09 07:52:49 Re: [HACKERS] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a /
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-11-09 07:38:55 Re: New tzdata available