Some questions about mammoth replication

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Some questions about mammoth replication
Date: 2007-10-11 10:57:22
Message-ID: 1192100242.6836.10.camel@hannu-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> btw, can you publicly discuss how CommandPrompts WAL-based
> replication works ?

It's my company, if course I am ;)... but not in this thread. If you
are interested feel free to email me directly or start a new thread.

Good :)

Here come my questions :

>From looking at http://www.commandprompt.com/images/MR_components.jpg it
seems that you don't do replication just from WAL logs, but also collect
some extra info inside postgreSQL server. Is this so ?

If it is, then in what way does it differ from simple trigger-based
change logging ?

Do you make use of snapshot data, to make sure, what parts of WAL log
are worth migrating to slaves , or do you just apply everything in WAL
in separate transactions and abort if you find out that original
transaction aborted ?

Are your slaves a) standby b) read-only or c) read-write ?

Do you extract / generate full sql DML queries from data in WAL logs, or
do you apply the changes at some lower level ?

For what use cases do you think your WAL-based approach is better than
Slony/Skytools trigger-based one ?

--------------
Hannu

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magne Mæhre 2007-10-11 12:06:19 Re: Timezone database changes
Previous Message Trevor Talbot 2007-10-11 10:55:38 Re: Timezone database changes