Re: Syntax bug? Group by?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net
Subject: Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
Date: 2006-10-17 21:21:53
Message-ID: 11881.1161120113@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> My question, is it a syntactic technicality that PostgreSQL asks for a
>> "group by," or a bug in the parser?

> AFAIK what you want is not per sql spec.

It would in fact be a violation of spec. Consider the case where there
are no rows matching 15. In this case

select min(tindex), avg(tindex) from y where ycis_id = 15;

will yield one row containing NULLs, whereas

select min(tindex), avg(tindex) from y where ycis_id = 15 group by ycis_id;

will yield no rows (because there are no groups). Therefore, if
Postgres were to implicitly insert a GROUP BY to make it legal to
reference ycis_id directly, we'd be changing the query behavior
and breaking spec.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2006-10-17 21:31:42 Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-10-17 21:19:37 Re: Syntax bug? Group by?