Re: Rule recompilation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rule recompilation
Date: 2001-07-12 19:50:42
Message-ID: 11880.994967442@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> You cannot control Tcl's bytecode compiler from the outside.

An excellent example. You don't *need* to control Tcl's bytecode
compiler from the outside, because *Tcl gets it right without help*.
It takes care of the function-text-to-derived-form dependency
internally: when you redefine the function, the internal form is
discarded and rebuilt. You don't have to worry about it.

What everyone else is telling you is that we should strive to do the
same, not punt and make the user tell us when to recompile.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-12 19:51:01 Re: Rule recompilation
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2001-07-12 19:46:33 Re: Rule recompilation