Re: More vacuum.c refactoring

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More vacuum.c refactoring
Date: 2004-08-06 14:56:48
Message-ID: 11855.1091804208@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:29:52 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Where are we on this, 2x. :-)

> Here:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> Will study these comments later, but it's too late at night here...

I haven't had time to review the original, already-applied refactoring,
let alone the follow-up. Considering that there's been at least one bug
report against the original (unused variable IIRC), I think it does need
reviewing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-06 15:09:07 Re: Open items
Previous Message Mike Rylander 2004-08-06 14:26:29 nntp server craziness