From: | valgog <valgog(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disable archiving |
Date: | 2007-07-24 07:33:55 |
Message-ID: | 1185262435.534092.57840@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Jul 23, 7:24 pm, Paul(dot)Vandenboga(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)Sun(dot)COM (Paul van den Bogaard)
wrote:
> the manual somewhere states "... if archiving is enabled..." To me
> this implies that archiving can be disabled. However I cannot find
> the parameter to use to get this result. Or should I enable archiving
> and use a backup script like
>
> #!/usr/bin/bash
> exit 0
>
> Would appreciate a hint. And yes I know I put my database in danger
> etc. This is for some benchmarks where I do not want the overhead of
> archiving. Jus a file system that will not fill with zillions of
> these 16MB WAL files ;^)
>
> Thanks
> Paul.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majord(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Is it normal to spoil other threads? or is it a bug?
If it is not a bug, please change the subject of the topic back to
what it was!
With best regards,
Valentine Gogichashvili
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Valentine Gogichashvili | 2007-07-24 07:40:43 | Re: multicolumn index column order |
Previous Message | andrew | 2007-07-24 07:10:30 | Re: multicolumn index column order |