Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: 2007-11-14 02:02:06
Message-ID: 11780.1195005726@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.

There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
Thoughts?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-14 03:17:04 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 01:56:46 Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation