| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
| Date: | 2010-02-20 17:49:55 |
| Message-ID: | 11774.1266688195@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This discussion is sounding very design-ish, which makes me think we
> should just leave things unchanged for 9.0 and have external regression
> test designers work around this problem in their Makefiles, as Alvaro
> suggested.
I would have said that some time ago, except that I think we have a
"must fix" issue here: isn't pg_upgrade broken for any database
containing plpgsql? A decent solution for that probably will allow
something to fall out for the regression test problem too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-20 17:55:27 | Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-20 17:46:38 | Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL |