Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Date: 2006-06-16 01:56:34
Message-ID: 11763.1150422994@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
>> Hm? I don't see any improvement there:

> I was referening this sentence, though I am not sure why that's the
> expectation:
>> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
>> If the patch worked, the first and third times will be similar, and
>> the second time will be high.

You need to label your results more clearly then. I thought you were
showing us three repeats of the same test, and I gather Bruce thought
so too...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-06-16 02:01:30 Re: problems with the anoncvs?
Previous Message Chris Campbell 2006-06-16 01:40:22 Preventing DELETE and UPDATE without a WHERE clause?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chander Ganesan 2006-06-16 03:13:23 Omitting tablespace creation from pg_dumpall...
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-06-16 01:34:12 Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-06-16 03:14:06 Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2006-06-16 01:34:12 Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement