Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 15:43:37
Message-ID: 11761.1305906217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> 2011/5/20 Devrim GNDZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
>> When we shut it down, all projects will all go somewhere else, and that
>> somewhere else might sound reliable to the people outside the community.
>> That is the only concern of me. Getting rid of CVS is fine, and they can
>> move their projects to git.postgresql.org, which would be excellent.
>> Still, is there a simple way that PostgreSQL infrastructure team can
>> provide hosting are for tarballs for ex-pgfoundry projects?

> I think we'd want to try to avoid doing that as it would require
> policing to ensure inappropriate content wasn't uploaded.

... yeah, that's a problem.

> Plus, people can always use SourceForge for distribution.

If you drive people to sourceforge for distribution, what value is there
in git.postgresql.org?

I need to figure out what to do with pg_filedump. All I need for it
is an SCM and someplace to put release tarballs. I'd prefer to use
git.postgresql.org, but if there's nowhere for tarballs, that's not
going to work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 15:48:58 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-05-20 15:36:11 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry