| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mariano Mara <mmara(at)fibertel(dot)com(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: supporting 2000 simultaneous connections. |
| Date: | 2007-03-02 16:00:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1172851223.20651.192.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 18:09, Mariano Mara wrote:
> Shiva Sarna escribió:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working on a web application where the front end is struts
> > framework and back end is PgSQL 7.4.
> >
> > The client want us to support 2000 simultaneous users. My question
> > is will there be any performance degradation if I increase the
> > max_connections of pgsql to 2000.
> >
> > Is there a limit to maximum number of simultaneous user supoorted by
> > pgsql.
> >
> > thanks for your time and help.
> You can test it. Use JMeter (http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/) and
> stress it to know where the limit is (according to your hardware, of
> course).
I have to toss my hat in on jmeter as well. It's not perfect, but it
gets the job done, and has a lot of programmability in it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-02 16:03:18 | Re: pg_dump, serial |
| Previous Message | Vincenzo Romano | 2007-03-02 15:56:31 | psql client quits after 1st command |