RE: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend

Yes, but since it is, why don't we inline it? Is there a possible
caveat?

Michael

--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes(at)debian(dot)org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 1998 4:08 PM
> To: meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Profile of current backend
> > Isn't this a good solution? A function only called by one other
> function has
> > its right to exist only for readability. And this optimization could
> be done
> > automatically.
>
> Wouldn't be such a big deal if it was not call so many times.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
> 19026
> + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
> + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)