Re: out of memory woes

From: "Angva" <angvaw(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: out of memory woes
Date: 2006-12-19 18:52:50
Message-ID: 1166554370.782416.294100@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"hubert depesz lubaczewski" wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2006 07:01:41 -0800, Angva <angvaw(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > shared_buffers = 57344
> > work_mem = 200000
> > maintenance_work_mem = 524288
> >
>
> work_mem seems to be high. what is you max_connections setting?

max_connections = 100

However we never come even close to 100 connections at once on this
database. Rarely, if ever, do we even reach 10. But I am unsure why
work_mem is set to 200000. I personally tuned shared_buffers and
maintenance_work_mem for performance, but I just don't know why
work_mem is what it is. So, I'll gladly accept any suggestions about
this setting. :)

Thanks a lot,
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-12-19 19:10:02 Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2006-12-19 18:23:26 Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.