Re: Let's play bash the search engine

From: Reece Hart <reece(at)harts(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Let's play bash the search engine
Date: 2006-12-19 01:04:21
Message-ID: 1166490261.20587.71.camel@snafu.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 15:47 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Take a look at let us know what you think and how it performs for you.

Terrific. Fast and meaningful.

I echo Thomas' request to have docs limited to a version (or, better,
most recent). Perhaps archived docs should be searched via a separate
page entirely.

Most the queries I did hit what I expected, except that the docs were
for old versions. (In fact, I don't think 8.2 docs ever showed up
first.)

I tried "defer constraints" and got a few not-too-useful hits. However,
"deferred constraints" returned meaningful links. Is that a stemmer
problem?

-Reece

--
Reece Hart, http://harts.net/reece/, GPG:0x25EC91A0
./universe -G 6.672e-11 -e 1.602e-19 -protonmass 1.673e-27 -uspres bush
kernel warning: universe consuming too many resources. Killing.
universe killed due to catastrophic leadership. Try -uspres carter.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Broersma Jr 2006-12-19 01:09:37 Re: feature request for Postgresql Rule system.
Previous Message Jorge Godoy 2006-12-19 00:54:16 Re: Let's play bash the search engine