Re: Bad iostat numbers

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
Date: 2006-12-04 16:37:34
Message-ID: 1165250254.14565.333.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:25, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> OTOH, with the choice at my last place of employment being LSI or
> Adaptec, LSI was a much better choice. :)
>
> I'd ask which LSI megaraid you've tested, and what driver was used.
> Does RHEL4 have the megaraid 2 driver?

Just wanted to add that what we used our database for at my last company
was for lots of mostly small writes / reads. I.e. sequential throughput
didn't really matter, but random write speed did. for that application,
the LSI Megaraid with battery backed cache was great.

Last point, bonnie++ is a good benchmarking tool, but until you test
your app / postgresql on top of the hardware, you can't really say how
well it will perform.

A controller that looks fast under a single bonnie++ thread might
perform poorly when there are 100+ pending writes, and vice versa, a
controller that looks mediocre under bonnie++ might shine when there's
heavy parallel write load to handle.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arjen van der Meijden 2006-12-04 16:41:14 Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-12-04 16:25:14 Re: Bad iostat numbers