From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bad iostat numbers |
Date: | 2006-12-04 16:37:34 |
Message-ID: | 1165250254.14565.333.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:25, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> OTOH, with the choice at my last place of employment being LSI or
> Adaptec, LSI was a much better choice. :)
>
> I'd ask which LSI megaraid you've tested, and what driver was used.
> Does RHEL4 have the megaraid 2 driver?
Just wanted to add that what we used our database for at my last company
was for lots of mostly small writes / reads. I.e. sequential throughput
didn't really matter, but random write speed did. for that application,
the LSI Megaraid with battery backed cache was great.
Last point, bonnie++ is a good benchmarking tool, but until you test
your app / postgresql on top of the hardware, you can't really say how
well it will perform.
A controller that looks fast under a single bonnie++ thread might
perform poorly when there are 100+ pending writes, and vice versa, a
controller that looks mediocre under bonnie++ might shine when there's
heavy parallel write load to handle.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2006-12-04 16:41:14 | Re: 8.2rc1 (much) slower than 8.2dev? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-12-04 16:25:14 | Re: Bad iostat numbers |