| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
| Date: | 2006-12-02 18:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1165085246.3778.991.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:22 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 11:05 -0600, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >
> > > O.k., doesn't this seem like killing a squirrel with a 50mm tank gun?
> > > The fact that this was suggested as anything but a last resort isn't to
> > > inspiring.
> > >
> >
> > Before you start ringing alarm bells, you need to instrument the actual
> > performance effect.
>
> Alarm bells? I saw a potential issue, I brought it to the community.
> That is all.
That's understood and appreciated. In case no one else says it: thanks.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-12-02 19:38:46 | Re: GUC description cleanup |
| Previous Message | Thomas H. | 2006-12-02 18:35:31 | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |