| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marcin Mańk <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: statement_timeout |
| Date: | 2006-11-21 17:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1164128568.3841.374.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?iso-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Ma=F1k?= <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have an unconfirmed feeling that autovac does not like system-wide
> > statement_timeout.
>
> If you have it set to less than the time needed to do a vacuum, then
> yes, autovac will fail. You expected differently? Do you think it's
> a good idea for autovac to ignore statement_timeout? (Maybe it is,
> but I suspect we'd get complaints about that too.)
Autovac *must* ignore statement_timeout if it is doing a wraparound
avoidance scan, surely?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-21 17:14:17 | Re: statement_timeout |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-11-21 16:43:24 | Re: where to download postgresql-server-7.2.2-1.i386.rpm? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-21 17:14:17 | Re: statement_timeout |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-21 16:36:01 | Re: quick review |