Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date: 2006-11-09 22:09:22
Message-ID: 1163110162.28784.119.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> But it seems to me that PostgreSQL otherwise offers a lot more, such
> as having a bunch of stored procedure languages, by default, as well
> as mature support for things like triggers, views, rules,
> notifications, an extensible type system, 2PC, custom aggregates, and
> such.
>
> Perhaps I am looking wrongly at "bundled functionality;" what sizable
> list of "bundled MySQL functionality" am I missing?

Replication would be the biggest one. However, you are looking at this
the wrong way... which is to say the honest and correct way.

Most people read the glossy cover, see the hot lingerie model and sign
up for the credit card. The same goes for reading the press about what
MySQL supposedly supports.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Liam O'Duibhir 2006-11-09 22:38:09 Re: The support pages on postgresql.org
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-11-09 22:03:35 Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0