Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Date: 2004-03-05 21:48:58
Message-ID: 11624.1078523338@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * With -i and virtual_host: bind to specified address(es) only.

> Can you bind one socket to more than one address?

Nope.  That's why we have provisions to listen on more than one socket.
I think that was implemented for virtual_host, but it'd be necessary
anyway for dual IPv4/IPv6 support.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-05 22:06:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Previous:From: Dennis HaneyDate: 2004-03-05 21:32:03
Subject: Re: IN joining

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-05 21:55:55
Subject: Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-05 20:02:10
Subject: Re: Updated version of contrib/xml (at last)

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-03-05 22:06:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Previous:From: jearlDate: 2004-03-05 18:54:00
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group