From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs |
Date: | 2006-10-18 14:25:37 |
Message-ID: | 1161181537.5719.42.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 15:44 +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> I'm not advocating that NULL should have a string-vaule of anything, just that
> the ||-operator shuld treat NULL as "dont bother with it and proceed
> concatenation".
Not only is the current behavior more logical (IMHO) and backward
compatible with existing Postgres application, it is consistent with the
SQL spec and most non-broken implementations of it. I think your chances
of getting the default behavior changed are slim indeed.
I think a more sensible proposal could be made for some sort of optional
"compatibility mode", as has been discussed many times in the past:
different NULL handling could theoretically be part of an Oracle SQL
dialect.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-10-18 14:35:25 | Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-10-18 14:21:28 | Re: bug or feature, || -operator and NULLs |