Re: Grammer Cleanup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Grammer Cleanup
Date: 2004-12-29 18:12:07
Message-ID: 11607.1104343927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Personally, I'd just like it to be
> consistent, when I was looking at how to add the grammar for group
> ownership group names were identified in one place as 'ColId' and another
> as 'UserId', iirc.

Oh, I had forgotten we already had a UserId production. Yes, I agree
that if we're going to have that at all, it should be used consistently
in the places it applies to.

Given other discussion, it might be best to rename it to RoleId and use
that for both users and groups.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2004-12-29 18:44:36 Re: Grammer Cleanup
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2004-12-29 18:00:00 Re: Grammer Cleanup