Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types

From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Date: 2006-10-09 14:29:44
Message-ID: 1160404184.19368.62.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 16:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think we've agreed that if you use some exclusion switches, but not
> any inclusion switches, then only the specific objects matching your
> switches are excluded. CVS HEAD gets this wrong, but I'm going to work
> on it today.

Cool, that makes it cover my use case and some more.

Thanks,
Csaba.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-09 14:36:26 Re: Fwd: pg_dump VS alter database ... set search_path ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-09 14:24:27 Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types