Should we coordinate a slashdot submission for 8.2?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Should we coordinate a slashdot submission for 8.2?
Date: 2006-10-03 00:31:27
Message-ID: 1159835487.25557.54.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Most major PostgreSQL news gets slashdotted, and I'm sure that makes up
a big part of the press PostgreSQL receives (as far as mindshare, at
least).

Should we coordinate a slashdot submission? I know it's non-
deterministic which one they choose, but I would think a submission from
Josh (since he's the official advocacy leader) would be more likely to
be used, if available.

Perhaps it would be beneficial because there is not room in a slashdot
blurb for the full press release. I would think that carefully chosen
words would benefit us more than waiting for a community member to send
in a submission.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-10-03 03:04:05 Re: Should we coordinate a slashdot submission for
Previous Message Dawid Kuroczko 2006-10-02 21:51:24 Re: Calling all Regional Contacts