Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date: 2002-12-31 04:47:54
Message-ID: 11580000.1041310074@palle.girgensohn.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Still am. ;-)

--On tisdag, december 31, 2002 10.01.34 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:

>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>
>> > ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql-devel ??
>>
>> I forgot one other possible answer: perhaps the port maintainer is taking
>> a well deserved holiday?
>
> Last time I checked, Palle _was_ the port maintainer :)
>
> Chris
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-31 16:36:37 Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-31 04:36:56 Re: Bug in Dependencies Code in 7.3.x?