Re: pg_terminate_backend

From: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
To: postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend
Date: 2006-08-03 16:33:03
Message-ID: 1154622782.21451.77.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:10, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> You didn't answer the original question: is killing SIGTERM a backend
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nevermind, I don't do that. I do 'kill backend_pid' without specifying
the signal, and I'm sufficiently unfamiliar with the unix signal names
to have confused them. Is a plain "kill" still dangerous ?

Thanks,
Csaba.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Wieland 2006-08-03 16:36:02 Re: ecpg test suite
Previous Message tomas 2006-08-03 16:22:42 Re: Patch to allow C extension modules to initialize/finish