Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-07-31 21:40:17
Message-ID: 1154382017.19546.3.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2006-07-25 kell 17:05, kirjutas Simon Riggs:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 11:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > That's fine, but feature freeze is in a week and we don't even have
> > the
> > basic function for manually doing a log file switch.  Let's get that
> > done first and then think about automatic switches.
> 
> Agreed.

Simon, did you (or anybody else) manage to complete the patch for adding
the (wal_filename, offset) returning function ?


-- 
----------------
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Akadeemia tee 21 F, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia

Skype me:  callto:hkrosing
Get Skype for free:  http://www.skype.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-31 21:46:12
Subject: Re: DTrace enabled build fails
Previous:From: Robert LorDate: 2006-07-31 21:36:00
Subject: Re: DTrace enabled build fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group