Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Date: 2006-07-25 16:05:36
Message-ID: 1153843536.2592.602.camel@holly
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 11:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's fine, but feature freeze is in a week and we don't even have
> the
> basic function for manually doing a log file switch. Let's get that
> done first and then think about automatic switches.

Agreed.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-25 16:05:49 Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived
Previous Message Chris Browne 2006-07-25 16:04:45 Re: Help! - Slony-I - saving/setting/restoring GUC