Re: Alternative variable length structure

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alternative variable length structure
Date: 2006-06-15 02:56:10
Message-ID: 1150340170.18271.2.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 16:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The code churn to do this is going to be quite significant

Why do you say that? Although the original patch posted to implement
this was incomplete, it certainly wasn't very large.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-06-15 02:57:05 Re: Alternative variable length structure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-06-15 02:28:49 Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches