64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?

From: Anthony Presley <anthony(at)resolution(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date: 2006-06-12 22:28:02
Message-ID: 1150151282.14661.42.camel@tigger
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi all!

I had an interesting discussion today w/ an Enterprise DB developer and
sales person, and was told, twice, that the 64-bit linux version of
Enterprise DB (which is based on the 64-bit version of PostgreSQL 8.1)
is SIGNIFICANTLY SLOWER than the 32-bit version. Since the guys of EDB
are PostgreSQL ..... has anyone seen that the 64-bit is slower than the
32-bit version?

I was told that the added 32-bits puts a "strain" and extra "overhead"
on the processor / etc.... which actually slows down the pointers and
necessary back-end "stuff" on the database.

I'm curious if anyone can back this up .... or debunk it. It's about
the polar opposite of everything I've heard from every other database
vendor for the past several years, and would be quite an eye-opener for
me.

Anyone?

Thanks.

--
Anthony

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-12 22:53:08 Re: Interesting slow query
Previous Message Zydoon 2006-06-12 21:47:07 Re: scaling up postgres