Re: State of Postgresql Replication?

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Postgresql Replication?
Date: 2006-06-09 18:51:23
Message-ID: 1149879083.21991.15.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 12:51, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:35:44PM -0400, Wei Weng wrote:
> > Is there any OSS solutions (stable) for postgresql replication for
> > postgresql 8.0?
>
> Slony, pgmirror, and I think there's another one.
> google:postgresql replication

pgpool does syncrhonous query level replication, in addition to
connection pooling. It also makes a good front end to slony.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2006-06-09 18:55:39 Access for Postgresql?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-06-09 18:21:40 Re: State of Postgresql Replication?