Re: Performance MSSql vs PostgreSql

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Ricardo Stuven <rstuven(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance MSSql vs PostgreSql
Date: 2006-05-10 06:58:37
Message-ID: 1147244317.4572.80.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 17:16 -0400, Ricardo Stuven wrote:
> Please, see http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=179064
>
> This is one of the few performance comparisons between PostgreSQL and
> MS SQL I have seen, and at first sight it seems too unfavorable to
> PgSQL... Maybe there is a bottleneck in the ODBC driver, Foxpro,
> VMWare or Windows, really I don't know, I'm not an expert, but I would
> not lightly believe in such results, especially for such queries that
> are so simple. However, a casual reader or someone wanting to choose
> between PostgreSQL and MS SQL could base his/her decision on that
> results.

All the queries tested are "Select *" issued with a single Exec, no
Fetch-es at all.

It's all down to how many rows are cached by the basic Exec call, in
anticipation of later Fetch-es.

You can always find a trick that one or other does better.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-05-10 12:01:13 Re: Banners on postgresql.org not running on pgsql?
Previous Message Matteo Beccati 2006-05-10 06:55:52 Re: Banners on postgresql.org not running on pgsql?